[js69]

I have been seeing a lot of heated discussion lately about the quality of still images and have been kinda thinking its a bit moot. I don't shoot still pictures at all any more, except for promotional purposes.
Most of the guys that I talk to surf only for videos now. As I do myself. Magazines are dead. I used to do stuff for Leg Show and that stable of mags, but that was more just for good traffic generation and the little ads at the back were magic for dvd sales.
Stills were also great before fast internet speeds for obvious reasons.
But today I think still images, though creative and pretty, are just not as horny as moving pictures. And I think most guys will whip it out...their CC that is...for videos before stills.
I, of course do vidcaps to satisfy that "still" jones.
Any opinions from either producers or marketers?